Minimum Black Hole as a Quantum Particle in a Box
Combining quantum mechanics (particle in a box) with general relativity to model the smallest possible black hole
Core Idea
We can model a microscopic black hole as a quantum particle confined to a region the size of its Schwarzschild radius. This creates a fascinating hybrid model combining quantum mechanics (particle in a box) with general relativity (black hole physics).
The minimum black hole corresponds to the ground state (n=1) of this quantum system.
The Hybrid Model
Particle in a Box Model: A quantum particle of mass M confined to a 1D box of length L.
Ground State Energy: E₁ = h²/(8ML²) for a particle in a 1D box.
Zero-Point Energy: The particle cannot have zero energy due to Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Wavefunction: ψ₁(x) = √(2/L) sin(πx/L) for 0 < x < L.
Schwarzschild Radius: Rₛ = 2GM/c² defines the event horizon of a non-rotating black hole.
Black Hole as Box: The black hole confines everything within Rₛ, analogous to a box of size L = 2Rₛ.
Mass-Energy Equivalence: E = Mc² relates the black hole's mass to its energy content.
Minimal Size: Quantum gravity suggests a minimum meaningful length scale near Planck length.
Box Size: L = 2Rₛ = 4GM/c² (diameter of black hole).
Quantum Ground State: The minimum energy configuration of a black hole.
Self-Consistency: The black hole's quantum energy should relate to its gravitational mass.
Planck Scale: At extremely small scales, both quantum and gravitational effects dominate.
Mathematical Derivation
For a particle of mass M in a 1D box of length L, the ground state energy is:
The box size is the black hole diameter. Using Schwarzschild radius Rₛ = 2GM/c²:
Substitute L into the quantum energy formula:
The quantum ground state energy E₁ should be related to the black hole's mass-energy Mc². For consistency, set E₁ ∼ Mc²:
Solving for M gives the minimum black hole mass:
where M_Planck = √(ħc/G) ≈ 2.18 × 10⁻⁸ kg is the Planck mass.
The corresponding minimum size is:
where ℓ_Planck = √(ħG/c³) ≈ 1.616 × 10⁻³⁵ m is the Planck length.
Minimum Black Hole Calculator
This is an extremely small mass by everyday standards but enormous for elementary particles (about 10¹⁹ times the proton mass).
Energy Scale Comparison
| Physical System | Characteristic Mass | Characteristic Size | Energy Scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum Black Hole (our model) | ~6.5 × 10⁻⁹ kg | ~1.6 × 10⁻³⁵ m | ~5.8 × 10⁸ J (~10¹⁹ GeV) |
| Proton | 1.67 × 10⁻²⁷ kg | ~0.84 × 10⁻¹⁵ m | ~1.5 × 10⁻¹⁰ J (~0.938 GeV) |
| Electron | 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg | < 10⁻¹⁸ m | ~8.2 × 10⁻¹⁴ J (~0.511 MeV) |
| Planck Mass System | 2.18 × 10⁻⁸ kg | 1.62 × 10⁻³⁵ m | ~1.96 × 10⁹ J (~1.22 × 10¹⁹ GeV) |
| Everyday Object (marble) | ~0.01 kg | ~0.01 m | ~9 × 10¹⁴ J |
Key Insight: The minimum black hole from our model has a mass about 10¹⁹ times larger than a proton, but a size 10²⁰ times smaller! This incredible density highlights why black holes require both quantum mechanics and general relativity for complete description.
The particle (black hole) has maximum probability density at the center of the "box" (Schwarzschild radius).
The wavefunction is zero at the boundaries (event horizon), suggesting the black hole is maximally confined.
Smaller black holes have higher quantum ground state energies.
As black holes evaporate via Hawking radiation, they become hotter and more energetic.
Hawking temperature increases as black hole mass decreases.
Our minimum black hole would have extremely high temperature T ∼ 10³² K.
Comparison with Other Approaches
| Model/Theory | Minimum Black Hole Mass | Key Assumptions | Physical Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our Particle-in-Box Model | ~0.3 M_Planck | Black hole as quantum particle in box of size 2Rₛ | Ground state of quantum gravitational system |
| Hawking Evaporation Endpoint | ~M_Planck | Black holes evaporate completely via Hawking radiation | Final stage before complete evaporation |
| Loop Quantum Gravity | ~M_Planck | Quantization of geometry at Planck scale | Minimal measurable area/volume in spacetime |
| String Theory | ~M_Planck or smaller | Fundamental strings as quantum gravity objects | Black holes as string/antistring bound states |
| Classical GR Limit | No minimum (any mass possible) | Pure classical general relativity | Continuum spacetime without quantum effects |
Physical Implications
Our model suggests that at the Planck scale (∼10⁻³⁵ m), quantum gravitational effects become dominant. A black hole of this size would be a quantum gravitational object requiring a full theory of quantum gravity for complete description.
The minimum black hole would have maximum temperature according to Hawking's formula T_H ∝ 1/M. As black holes evaporate, they approach this minimum size with extremely high temperature, potentially leading to a final explosive evaporation.
If black holes evaporate completely (down to Planck scale remnants), what happens to the information they absorbed? Our minimum black hole model suggests a possible endpoint for evaporation that might preserve information.
The early universe might have produced primordial black holes with masses near the Planck scale. These would be evaporating today and could be detected through their final burst of Hawking radiation.
Limitations and Caveats
Treating a black hole as a simple 1D particle in a box is a drastic simplification. Real black holes are 3D objects with spherical symmetry, angular momentum, and charge.
We don't have a complete theory of quantum gravity. Our model combines quantum mechanics and general relativity in an ad hoc way that may not reflect how they truly unite at the Planck scale.
The appropriate boundary conditions at the event horizon are not clearly "infinite wall" conditions. Quantum fields near horizons have subtle boundary conditions related to Hawking radiation.
The standard particle-in-a-box model uses non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Near Planck scale, relativistic effects are crucial and the Klein-Gordon or Dirac equation would be more appropriate.
Despite these limitations, the model provides valuable conceptual insights and demonstrates how combining simple quantum and gravitational concepts leads naturally to the Planck scale.
Python Implementation
Here's Python code to calculate properties of our minimum black hole model:
import numpy as np
# Fundamental constants
c = 2.99792458e8 # m/s (speed of light)
G = 6.67430e-11 # m³/kg/s² (gravitational constant)
hbar = 1.054571817e-34 # J·s (reduced Planck constant)
h = 2*np.pi*hbar # Planck constant
def minimum_blackhole_particle_in_box():
"""
Calculate properties of minimum black hole using particle-in-box model
"""
# Planck mass and length
M_planck = np.sqrt(hbar*c/G)
L_planck = np.sqrt(hbar*G/c**3)
print(f"Planck mass: {M_planck:.3e} kg")
print(f"Planck length: {L_planck:.3e} m")
# Our model's minimum black hole mass (from derivation)
M_min = M_planck / (128**(1/4)) # Approximately 0.3 M_planck
print(f"\nMinimum black hole mass (our model): {M_min:.3e} kg")
print(f" In Planck masses: {M_min/M_planck:.3f} M_planck")
# Corresponding Schwarzschild radius
R_s_min = 2*G*M_min/c**2
print(f"Schwarzschild radius: {R_s_min:.3e} m")
print(f" In Planck lengths: {R_s_min/L_planck:.3f} L_planck")
# Box size (diameter) in our model
L_box = 2*R_s_min
print(f"Box size (2 × R_s): {L_box:.3e} m")
# Quantum ground state energy
E1_quantum = h**2 / (8 * M_min * L_box**2)
print(f"\nQuantum ground state energy: {E1_quantum:.3e} J")
# Compare with black hole mass-energy
E_mass = M_min * c**2
print(f"Mass-energy (Mc²): {E_mass:.3e} J")
print(f"Ratio E1/E_mass: {E1_quantum/E_mass:.3e}")
# Hawking temperature for this black hole
T_hawking = hbar*c**3 / (8*np.pi*G*M_min*1.380649e-23) # Boltzmann constant in denominator
print(f"\nHawking temperature: {T_hawking:.3e} K")
# Energy of Hawking radiation photons
E_hawking_typical = 2.821 * 1.380649e-23 * T_hawking # Peak of blackbody
print(f"Typical Hawking photon energy: {E_hawking_typical:.3e} J")
print(f" In GeV: {E_hawking_typical/1.602e-10:.3e} GeV")
return M_min, R_s_min, E1_quantum
def compare_with_particles():
"""Compare minimum black hole with elementary particles"""
M_proton = 1.6726219e-27 # kg
M_electron = 9.10938356e-31 # kg
M_min, R_s_min, _ = minimum_blackhole_particle_in_box()
print(f"\n--- Comparison with Particles ---")
print(f"Minimum BH mass / Proton mass: {M_min/M_proton:.3e}")
print(f"Minimum BH mass / Electron mass: {M_min/M_electron:.3e}")
# Size comparison
R_proton = 0.84e-15 # m (approximate proton radius)
print(f"\nSchwarzschild radius / Proton radius: {R_s_min/R_proton:.3e}")
# Density comparison
rho_bh = M_min / (4/3 * np.pi * R_s_min**3)
rho_proton = M_proton / (4/3 * np.pi * R_proton**3)
print(f"\nBlack hole density: {rho_bh:.3e} kg/m³")
print(f"Proton density: {rho_proton:.3e} kg/m³")
print(f"Density ratio (BH/Proton): {rho_bh/rho_proton:.3e}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
M_min, R_s_min, E1 = minimum_blackhole_particle_in_box()
compare_with_particles()
Running this code reveals that our minimum black hole is about 10¹⁹ times more massive than a proton but 10²⁰ times smaller, resulting in unimaginable density.
Extensions and Future Directions
A more realistic model would use a 3D spherical infinite well with radius Rₛ. The ground state solution would involve spherical Bessel functions instead of simple sine waves.
Using the Klein-Gordon equation (for spin-0) or Dirac equation (for spin-1/2) would incorporate relativistic effects crucial near the Planck scale.
A proper treatment would involve quantum field theory in the curved spacetime of the black hole, which naturally leads to Hawking radiation.
Real black holes often rotate. Including angular momentum (Kerr black holes) would significantly complicate the quantum model.
Despite its simplicity, our hybrid model provides intriguing insights into how quantum mechanics and gravity might intersect at the smallest scales, pointing toward the need for a complete theory of quantum gravity.
No comments:
Post a Comment