Mathematical Models for Network Topologies
Essential equations and algorithms for mapping and analyzing network structures
Fundamental Graph Theory Equations
Adjacency Matrix Representation
The most fundamental representation of any network topology is the adjacency matrix A, where:
For undirected graphs: A = AT (symmetric)
For weighted graphs: A[i][j] = weight of edge (i,j)
Laplacian Matrix
Captures both connectivity and degree information of the graph:
Where D is the degree matrix (diagonal matrix with D[i][i] = degree of node i)
Lnorm = D-1/2 L D-1/2 = I - D-1/2 A D-1/2
Graph Convolutional Network Equation
The core operation for applying convolutional filters on graph structures:
 = D̃-1/2 à D̃-1/2 (normalized adjacency with self-loops)
à = A + I (adjacency matrix with self-connections)
D̃ = degree matrix of Ã
H(l) = node features at layer l
W(l) = trainable weight matrix at layer l
σ = activation function
Shortest Path Algorithms
Dijkstra's algorithm for weighted graphs with non-negative weights:
Floyd-Warshall for all pairs shortest paths:
Topology-Specific Mathematical Models
Star Topology Metrics
For a star network with n nodes (1 central hub, n-1 peripheral nodes):
Mesh Topology Metrics
For a full mesh network with n nodes:
Ring Topology Metrics
For a ring network with n nodes:
Betweenness Centrality
Measures node importance based on shortest paths passing through it:
Where σst is the number of shortest paths from s to t, and σst(v) is the number of those paths passing through v.
Computational Complexity
| Algorithm/Operation | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjacency Matrix Storage | O(1) edge lookup | O(V²) | Dense graphs |
| Adjacency List Storage | O(degree(v)) edge lookup | O(V+E) | Sparse graphs |
| Breadth-First Search (BFS) | O(V+E) | O(V) | Shortest paths in unweighted graphs |
| Dijkstra's Algorithm | O((V+E) log V) | O(V) | Weighted graphs with non-negative weights |
| Floyd-Warshall Algorithm | O(V³) | O(V²) | All pairs shortest paths |
| GCN Forward Pass | O(E×F) per layer | O(V×F + E) | Node classification, graph analysis |
Matrix Representations Examples
Star Network (4 nodes)
Adjacency Matrix A:
[0 1 1 1]
[1 0 0 0]
[1 0 0 0]
[1 0 0 0]
Degree Matrix D:
[3 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0]
[0 0 1 0]
[0 0 0 1]
Laplacian Matrix L = D - A:
[ 3 -1 -1 -1]
[-1 1 0 0]
[-1 0 1 0]
[-1 0 0 1]
Ring Network (4 nodes)
Adjacency Matrix A:
[0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]
[0 1 0 1]
[1 0 1 0]
Practical Implementation Considerations
Sparse Matrix Storage
For large networks, use compressed sparse row (CSR) format to store adjacency matrices efficiently, reducing storage from O(V²) to O(V+E).
Approximation Algorithms
For massive graphs, use betweenness centrality approximations or landmark-based shortest path estimation to reduce computational complexity.
Parallel Processing
Leverage GPU acceleration for GCN operations and graph algorithms, particularly for matrix multiplications and neighborhood aggregations.
Dynamic Graphs
For evolving networks, use incremental algorithms that update metrics without recomputing from scratch, saving computational resources.
No comments:
Post a Comment