Ideologies of Conflict
Salafism, Boko Haram, Iran, and Afghanistan
This analysis examines how Salafist movements, Boko Haram, Iran, and the Taliban in Afghanistan construe their goals within frameworks of historical struggle and manifest destiny. These groups conceptualize their goals within frameworks that frequently blend religious eschatology with political ambition, creating potent ideologies that motivate followers and justify often violent actions.
While they often employ rational strategic calculations and technological tools, their core ideologies typically rest on deeply irrationalist foundations including divine mandate, apocalyptic thinking, and mythological historical narratives.
Salafist Movements: Purification Through Conflict
Historical and Theological Foundations
Salafism represents a puritanical approach to Islam that seeks to return to the practices of the "pious predecessors" (al-salaf al-ṣāliḥ), referring to the earliest generations of Muslims.
Historical Struggle Framework
Salafist movements conceptualize history as a process of religious degeneration from an idealized past and frame their mission as one of purification and restoration.
Key Objectives
Elimination of innovation (bid'ah), rejection of Western influence, and establishment of Sharia governance.
Manifest Destiny and Eschatological Framing
Many Salafist groups articulate a vision of Islamic manifest destiny that anticipates the eventual global dominance of their interpretation of Islam.
| Framework Element | Description | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Apocalyptic narratives | Drawing on Islamic eschatological traditions | Predict ultimate victory for the righteous remnant |
| Historical determinism | Viewing current conflicts as predetermined process | Frame setbacks as temporary tests of faith |
| Divine mandate | Belief in religious sanction for actions | Provide sense of inevitable success through divine support |
Boko Haram: Anti-Westernization as Sacred Struggle
Ideological Foundations and Goals
Boko Haram (officially Jama'at Ahl al-Sunnah li-l-Da'wah wa'l-Jihād) represents a particularly virulent form of Salafist-jihadism in Nigeria and the Lake Chad region.
Anti-Western Focus
The group's popular name means "Western education is forbidden," though it claims its true meaning is "Western civilization is forbidden".
Historical Struggle Framework
Boko Haram frames its violence as necessary response to historical injustices:
Colonial Legacy
Viewing contemporary Nigerian state structures as illegitimate continuations of colonial oppression
Positioning itself as champion of the economically dispossessed in northern Nigeria
Religious Persecution
Claiming to defend Muslims against state violence and Christian domination
Positioning itself within a global historical struggle through ISIS affiliation
Evolution of Boko Haram's Goals
| Period | Primary Framing | Key Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| 2002-2009 (Yusuf period) | Religious reform | Islamic education, moral purification |
| 2010-2014 (Shekau period) | Anti-state rebellion | Overthrow Nigerian government, establish caliphate |
| 2015-present (ISIS affiliation) | Global jihad | Regional caliphate, international terrorism |
Iran: Revolutionary Expansionism
Shia Islamic Revolution as Historical Turning Point
The Islamic Republic of Iran articulates a vision of historical struggle centered on the Shia Islamic revolution of 1979 as a watershed moment in human history.
Export of Revolution
Spreading its model of Islamic governance beyond Iran's borders through both conventional state power and proxy networks.
Resistance Axis Leadership
Positioning itself as leader of a transnational network opposing Western and Israeli influence.
Manifest Destiny and Technological Adaptation
Iran articulates a distinctive vision of Islamic manifest destiny that differs from Sunni Salafist movements:
Strategic Approach
Viewing historical change as gradual process requiring sustained effort
Embracing technology while rejecting Western cultural influence
Religious Foundation
Mahdistic destiny - preparing the way for the return of the Hidden Imam
Shia historical narrative of resistance against oppression
Afghanistan: Taliban's Theocratic Governance
Islamic Emirate as Divine Mandate
The Taliban in Afghanistan construes its goals through the framework of establishing and protecting an Islamic Emirate that implements its strict interpretation of Islamic law.
Resistance Narrative
Framing its fight against Soviet, American, and NATO forces as religious obligation and divine mandate.
Governance Approach and Technological Relationship
The Taliban demonstrates a complex relationship with technology and modern statecraft:
| Aspect | Approach | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Technological Adoption | Selective adoption | Using modern weapons and communications while rejecting other technological influences |
| Governance Model | Islamic governance | Implementing a pre-modern legal system while managing a modern state apparatus |
| International Engagement | Pragmatic participation | Participating in diplomatic processes while maintaining ideological rigidity |
Conclusion: Convergence and Divergence in Goals
These movements share significant commonalities in how they construe their goals within frameworks of historical struggle and manifest destiny while differing in specific objectives and methods.
Shared Features
Rejection of Western hegemony
Desire for Islamic governance
Use of conflict narratives
Distinctive Elements
Sectarian differences
Relationship to nation-state system
Technological adaptation
All four movements demonstrate the enduring power of historical narrative and religious framing in motivating collective action and justifying political violence. Their ability to blend seemingly contradictory elements helps explain their persistence despite significant opposition.
No comments:
Post a Comment