Rules of Inference in First-Order Logic
A comprehensive guide to the fundamental inference rules that form the basis of logical reasoning
Introduction to Inference Rules
First-order logic extends propositional logic with quantifiers and predicates. Inference rules are essential for constructing valid arguments and proofs in logical systems. These rules allow us to derive new statements from existing ones while preserving truth.
Core Rules from Propositional Logic
If P implies Q, and P is true, then Q is true.
P
∴ Q
If P implies Q, and Q is false, then P is false.
¬Q
∴ ¬P
If P implies Q and Q implies R, then P implies R.
Q → R
∴ P → R
If P or Q is true, and P is false, then Q is true.
¬P
∴ Q
If P is true and Q is true, then P and Q is true.
Q
∴ P ∧ Q
If P and Q is true, then P is true and Q is true.
∴ P
∴ Q
Quantifier Rules (Specific to First-Order Logic)
From a universally quantified statement, we can infer any instance.
∴ P(c) (for any specific constant c)
From a specific instance, we can infer an existentially quantified statement.
∴ ∃x P(x)
If we can prove P(c) for an arbitrary constant c, then we can infer ∀x P(x).
∴ ∀x P(x)
From an existentially quantified statement, we can introduce a new constant.
∴ P(c) (where c is a new constant)
Example Proof
Let's prove: ∀x (P(x) → Q(x)), ∀x P(x) ∴ ∀x Q(x)
Important Notes
- Universal Generalization (UG) requires that the constant c is truly arbitrary (not appearing in any premises)
- Existential Instantiation (EI) requires introducing a new constant that hasn't been used before
- These rules form a complete system for first-order logic proofs
- Natural deduction systems organize these rules into introduction and elimination rules for each connective
Conclusion
These inference rules allow us to construct formal proofs in first-order logic, moving from premises to conclusions through valid logical steps. Mastering these rules is essential for understanding logical reasoning, mathematical proofs, and formal verification in computer science.
No comments:
Post a Comment