Plato vs. Homer

The Philosophical Tournament in The Republic

The "Ancient Quarrel" Between Philosophy and Poetry

Plato (through Socrates) frames an explicit tension between philosophy and poetry, singling out Homer as the primary representative of poetic tradition.

Homer was revered as "the educator of Hellas," whose epics shaped Greek values, myths, and cultural identity.

In Republic Book X, Socrates calls this the "ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry" (607b).

"We are well aware that poetry of this kind [Homeric epic] is not to be taken seriously, as a serious rival to truth; the listener too must be on his guard, fearing for the regime in himself."

- Plato, The Republic (608a)

Plato's Critique of Homeric Values

Theological Concerns

Plato rejects Homer's portrayal of the gods as deceitful, vengeful, or immoral. He insists that divinity must be portrayed as purely good, simple, and truthful.

Moral and Pedagogical Concerns

Homeric heroes (like Achilles) prioritize honor, glory, and revenge, while Plato advocates for justice as an intrinsic good—not merely for its rewards.

Epistemological Concerns

Plato critiques poets as "imitators" who lack true knowledge of reality (Book X). Homer, though admired, is seen as three steps removed from the Truth (the Form of the Good).

Plato's Strategic Engagement with Homer

Rather than outright rejecting Homer, Plato selectively appropriates and reforms Homeric material.

• He retains passages compatible with philosophical aims while censoring or allegorizing others
• He creates rival myths (e.g., the Myth of Er in Book X) to replace Homeric narratives
• The structure of The Republic itself echoes Homeric epic but subverts it to philosophical ends

Socrates' "descent" to the Piraeus mirrors Odysseus' descent to Hades but transforms it into a philosophical journey.

Cultural and Historical Context

Homer's epics were performed at Athenian festivals like the Panathenaia, forming a core part of Greek paideia (education).

Plato's dialogue responds to this cultural hegemony by proposing a reformed curriculum guided by philosophy.

The debate addressed existential questions: How should we live? What is justice? Who should rule?

This was not merely academic—it was a contest for the soul of Greek civilization.

🏛️

Plato
(c. 428-348 BCE)

Philosopher, founder of the Academy, student of Socrates

⚔️

🎭

Homer
(c. 8th century BCE)

Epic poet, author of the Iliad and Odyssey

Outcome of the "Tournament"

Plato's Republic can be seen as a victory for philosophy in defining its domain against poetic tradition.

• Plato acknowledges poetry's power but seeks to harness it under philosophical rule
• This contest influenced later traditions—Alexandrian scholars standardized Homeric texts
• Neoplatonists (like Proclus) developed allegorical readings to harmonize Homer with Plato
• The debate shaped Western thought for millennia

"The measure of a man is what he does with power."

- Attributed to Plato

Conclusion: A Metaphorical Tournament

While no literal tournament occurred, Plato's Republic stages a deliberate and high-stakes intellectual showdown with Homer.

Plato aims to dethrone Homer as Greece's moral educator and establish philosophy as the new guiding force—a contest that would define the trajectory of Western philosophy.

This philosophical "tournament" represents one of the most significant intellectual engagements in history, pitting the established poetic tradition against the emerging discipline of philosophy.

Information compiled from philosophical and classical studies sources

© 2023 Philosophy and Classical Literature Exploration