Lenin's Critique of "Things-in-Themselves" & "World Objects"
Lenin's critique appears in Materialism and Empirio-Criticism (1909), targeting neo-Kantian and positivist influences among Marxists. His analysis centers on two key concepts:
1. Kant's "Thing-in-Itself" (Ding an sich)
Kant's Concept:
The "thing-in-itself" represents ultimate reality independent of human perception. Humans can only know phenomena (reality filtered through mental categories like space/time), never the true essence of things.
Lenin's Critique:
- Agnostic & Idealist:
- Creates artificial barrier between consciousness and reality
- Leads to idealism by denying knowability of matter
- Unnecessary & Harmful:
- Dialectical materialism rejects unknowable cores
- Practice (experiment, industry) transforms "things-in-themselves" into "things-for-us"
- Concession to Fideism:
- Opens door for religion to fill "unknowable" gaps
- Undermines scientific materialism
2. Mach/Avenarius's "World Objects"
Empirio-Critical Concept:
Reality consists of "elements" (neutral sensations - colors, sounds, etc.). "World objects" are merely stable complexes of these sensations, eliminating mind-matter dualism.
Lenin's Critique:
- Subjective Idealism:
- Repackaged Berkeleyanism ("to be is to be perceived")
- Leads to solipsism without objective basis
- Denial of Objective Reality:
- Reverses materialist primacy of matter over consciousness
- Sensations are properties of matter (brain), not foundations
- "Neutral Elements" Smokescreen:
- Ultimately reduces to sensations, exposing idealism
- Anti-Scientific "Economy of Thought":
- Rejects discovery of real structures (e.g., atoms)
- Reduces science to cataloging sensations
Lenin's Core Materialist Position
- Materialist Monism: Matter exists eternally, independent of mind
- Reflection Theory: Consciousness reflects objective reality
- Practice as Criterion: Social practice (experiment, revolution) verifies knowledge
- Anti-Agnosticism: Relative knowledge progressively approximates absolute truth
In Summary
Lenin attacked Kant's "thing-in-itself" as an idealist barrier to knowing objective reality, and Mach's "world objects" as subjective idealism denying matter's primacy. He defended dialectical materialism: objective reality exists independently of consciousness; knowledge reflects this reality through practice; science progressively reveals material truth without Kantian limits.
No comments:
Post a Comment